I guess
this is more of a writer question than a reader question. In general readers
don't really care if a book's Christian or not as long as it's good. I've never
met anybody dead set on reading only Christian books.
But there
are plenty of Christian writers who are dead set on writing them. After all, if you're Christian you want to be a
witness to God and glorify him, and how can you glorify him by writing an
apparently unchristian book? That would put us in the box of
"secular" and how can that be glorifying to God?
I've been
wondering about this for a while now. Since I started writing at fourteen my
Mom would always ask me if my book had a "redeeming quality" about
it. For a long time I thought she just meant all the characters should be
Christian, or at least become Christian in the end, or at least I should spell
out the gospel at some point.
Then I
thought, why? If a book is Christian, who will read it? Probably only people
who already know the gospel. So what good will that do them if I tell them the
gospel? I've never heard of anybody being converted by reading a book besides
the Bible.
I will
admit I don't have much expertise on Christian books. If you rule out Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter and The Chronicles of Narnia then I have
only read five. Two of them were from the Mandy Series. The other two were from
some wild-west genre similar to The Love
Comes softly series. The last one
I just finished was The Last Sin Eater
which was in fact the only Christian book I have enjoyed.
None of
these books edified me. None of them drew me closer to Christ in any way. All
of them had a moment of someone converting, and most of them were simply
every-day lives with characters facing situations with "God's on my
side," or "God'll take care of us." Things like that sound
unhelpful enough in real life, but they're downright cheesy in a book. And
because books say things like that, they're considered Christian.
I write
books. My first book, I'll admit, was in the Christian-convert category. My
second book was in the Cheesy-Christian category which is why I never had it
published. And now, starting my third book which has absolutely no direct
reference to God at all, I have chosen to keep it that way.
As
Christians we should make everything we do glorifying to God, but the thing is:
are books that are geared to help unbelievers come to faith helpful when
unbelievers never read them? Are
books that simply shove God into them because the author feels he needs to
helpful? What makes a book glorifying to God? I think J.K. Rowling understood
that in the Harry Potter series when
she kept the reference to salvation to the end, hooking an unbelieving audience
so that they would hear what she had to say. And hey, what unbeliever hasn't
read Harry Potter?
Take Lord of the Rings. There is no God,
technically. Actually there are several "gods" who made the world and
who were all made by one God. Technically it is not an allegory. So why is the
series considered Christian? Because the book exemplifies a Christian response
to difficult problems. Books like that help you think about life, help you
apply Christianity to problems the world faces.
I feel more
edified reading non-Christian books than Christian books. I guess it's because
Christians oftentimes don't think about important issues; they assume that
"Jesus died" conquers everything. And it's true. But how? What is everything that Jesus conquers? How
should we face those issues with a Christian perspective?
Another
book is Notes From Underground. The
Russian author (and I'm not going to bother trying to spell his name) was definitely a Christian, but the book
never mentions God. In fact, the book is the opposite of mentioning God. It's about a sniveling little nihilist
who's trying to avoid fate. Because the book brought up these important issues
and made me think about them, I felt it was much more edifying than any
"Christian" book I have ever read.
Esther in
the Bible never mentions God. The whole book never says anything about him at
all. But is that book Christian? Well, it's in the Bible! And it points to
God's salvation and protection of his people. Jesus's stories don't always talk
about God either, but they show what God's world is like.
I've
decided that I can glorify God in my books without even having to mention him.
The book itself is Christian because I am Christian; the book is Christian
because it is written from a Christian's perspective of God's world. I want my
Christian audience to think about the issues of racism, euthanasia and tyranny;
I don't want my non-Christian
audience to shut down from facing these issues simply because my Characters
keep saying "God" when they don't need to.
What my Mom
meant by redeeming quality was not that the whole story is totally negligent of
the real world and only attached to Christianity by a small thread of
"God"s mentioned here and there. The book itself will be redemptive
if it points to characteristics of God or of mankind that will encourage us as
Christians and make us think about important issues. That's what really makes a
book Christian.
Good thoughts, Bliss. I entirely agree; a book is "Christian" when it is true and deals with life in a realistic way, because Christianity is true and the truth is Christianity. However, I've never really understood the label "Christian" when applied to books. You hate 1984, for instance. Is it because it's an "anti-Christian" book? It's not the book's fault that Orwell was an atheist. Yet we act like it's some wicked thing with a will of its own. I happen to like 1984. I don't think it's anti-Christian. It was written from a nihilistic perspective, no doubt, but that very nihilistic perspective is a real part of this world and thus something to be addressed by Christians. To dialogue with unbelievers we should understand their works. Orwell himself could not escape Christianity, because he could not escape reality.
ReplyDeleteThis is not at all a critique to what you have said; it's just a circumlocutive way of saying that I think we need different categories for books besides "Christian" and "non-Christian," and since I don't have any better names for them the above comment amounts to no more than a wistful musing of a silly procrastinating Omnibus student.
Well, your ramblings are as good as mine if not better so.
DeleteIt is definitely difficult to box things like this, I agree.
Yes. All of it. Yay :D This is why literature is so thrilling and brilliant and majestic. The lie that tells the truth...
ReplyDeleteAnyway. This makes me very happy. That is all.
When you get out this way, I'll let you read some of my books.... I do like "clean" books..
ReplyDeleteI have lots of mystery books.. most written by lawyers that know Jesus. So I would say that "clean" books are my favorite.
Who is Samuel Titus? Very wordy!! :)
love u lots..
Clean books, yes, they're usually best.
DeleteYes, I am very wordy
I've been mulling over this for a while, Bliss. Very interesting thoughts, especially concerning LotR and Harry Potter, which both concern magic. In the end you have to ask yourself the crucial question of whether or not it's edifying, and also take into consideration Augustine's view of reaping the benefits and discarding the rubbish. Love reading your posts :)
ReplyDelete